Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:15

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
6 Daily Habits Doctors Say Will Help You Live Longer - SELF Magazine
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
What are your thoughts on RM's new album "Right Place, Wrong Person"?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What does it mean when someone says "I'm feeling frisky"?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What one thing makes someone a very mature person?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How Many Burgers Are Too Many Burgers? Here's What Health Experts Advise. - HuffPost